Florida's Second Congressional District

 

Home Biography  National Issues  Volunteer Campaign News
Contact Family History District  2 $   Support  $ News Links

 

New Solutions       New Direction      New Hope

 

Energy Independence

Explore offshore drilling     

   Yes

 Explore drilling in ANWR    

   Yes

Explore nuclear power options     

   Yes

Explore solar, wind  and hydrogen     

   Yes

 Explore all new energy innovations    

   Yes
 

Hydrogen Powered Truck

Central Phoenix Technical High School - Student Test Vehicle 

The vehicle above uses solar panels to create electricity to convert water into hydrogen.  The solar system can be taken off the vehicle and placed in a backyard.  The process of filling the hydrogen tanks is as simple as filling your tires with air.  The exhaust from this vehicle is pure water.  Most any vehicle can be converted to run on hydrogen.

Note: Conservation is something we can all act on today.   Becoming energy independent will be the result of a monumental effort at the industrial level and will take many years to accomplish.  However, we can all start the energy independence process now as described in the picture above.

Energy independence is a primary goal of mine.  The Untied States is an enormous consumer of energy which has caused “fueling the future” to become a major national issue of great concern.  This is a very important topic that takes into account many economic variables that our country must carefully analyze in an effort to stabilize and secure our nation’s future.   Energy independence can translate into more jobs by revitalizing our diminishing industrial sector if we take more aggressive action to implement innovative technologies.  Converting to hydrogen, natural gas, solar, and wind is the energy foundation of the future. However, we need to explore all over our coal, petroleum and nuclear options in the process of becoming energy independent. 

On May 15, 2008 differences were resolved for H.R. 2419: Food and Energy Security Act of 2007, passed through the Senate and awaits a signature from the President.  Portions of this bill offer tax credits for residential and business that create electricity from wind power (Part I  -- Sec. 12301),   and several tax credit provisions involving production of cellulosic biofuel, ethanol, biodiesel, renewables, and alternative fuels (Parts  II, III, and IV).

Although these measures are a step in the right direction, much more effort is needed if we are going  to replace oil in a “big way.”  Placing the responsibility on farmers to produce crops to make fuel is an interesting and a sincere effort,  however,  has its limitations.  For example,  as farms use more land to grow corn to make ethanol,  reports have found that this is causing an increase in food prices.  Also, reports indicate the emissions for ethanol are more harmful to humans than emissions form gasoline, and the rate of return on making ethanol from corn is only 15%. 

I would propose and support legislation that would take a stronger stance on energy independence that would offer a wider range of incentives for those entities investing the necessary capital for research and develop.  Businesses that agree to take advantage of the tax credits must  hire legal workers and derive most, if not all, of their material and supplies from domestic sources.  In other words, out-sourcing would be prohibited for those entities taking advantage of energy related incentives offered by our government. 

The first step to addressing energy independence is to make an assessment of our country’s energy sources - domestic and imports.  Below is a snap shot of  the sources of  energy that we are dependent on.  Please evaluate to begin understanding the magnitude of what we must do to become more energy independent.

Petroleum
United States has approximately 6% of the world’s population but consumes about 40% of the world’s oil, mainly as fuel for internal combustion engines and electric plants. Our country only produces 6% of our domestic oil needs.   Most imports come into the Gulf of Mexico and are dispensed and refined in Texas and Louisiana.  If we are going to become energy independent we need to explore all our domestic oil resources.

I agree that we must start drilling offshore for oil at a reasonable and safe distance from the coastline.  The government of Mexico already has a very active oil drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico, and the U.S. should participate.

I agree to drilling in ANWR.  It is often stated that drilling in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) has been considered a political football ever since the days of the false oil shortages in the late 1970's.   Experts suggest that drilling for oil in ANWR would only provide our country a 15 to 20 year oil supply if used to offset our dependency at a rate of  5%  per year.  Hypothetically, if the oil in ANWR was used at full capacity (supplying 100% of our needs),  the supply would only last for approximately 400 days. Nevertheless, we must continue to explore this option.  

Below is a chart that describes the United States import status of crude oil and petroleum.

Crude Oil Importing 

January to May  2008

1000    barrels per day

 

Total import of Petroleum

  January to May  2008

1000 barrels per day

 

 

 

 

Canada

1863

Canada

2451

Saudi Arabia

1541

Saudi Arabia

1556

Mexico

1220

Mexico

1329

Nigeria

1097

Nigeria

1126

Venezuela

980

Venezuela

1146

Iraq

697

Iraq

697

Angola

429

Algeria

484

Algeria

264

Russia

412

Ecuador

217

Angola

438

Brazil

175

Virgin Islands

340

Kuwait

225

Ecuador

229

Colombia

169

United Kingdom

196

Russia

68

Brazil

197

Chad

103

Kuwait

227

United Kingdom

80

Colombia

195

Source: Energy Information Administration.

Coal
I agree with expanding clean coal technologies.  Coal production in the Untied States is over a trillion tons a year and accounts for 51% of domestic energy production.  Electric plants are the major buyer of coal, accounting for 92% of all coal consumed.  It is estimated that the U.S. has over a 400-year supply of coal and is relatively cost effective. However, burning coal causes air pollution by emitting sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide into the atmosphere, which is a  major contributor to greenhouse gases.

In an effort to offset the emissions from coal burning electrical production some innovators have suggested placing aquatic algae ponds next to the power stations.  The carbon dioxide exhaust can be pumped to feed the algae, which would result in a very rich form of biodiesel.  

Nuclear
I agree to exploring Nuclear energy.  Uranium is the key source of fuel to operate a nuclear power plant. The first U.S. nuclear power plant went into commercial operation in 1957 at Shippingport, Pennsylvania.  The major use of nuclear power is for producing electricity and accounts for 20% of U.S. electrical production. Currently, there are 104 nuclear power plants in the United States that produces over 780 billion-kilowatt hours.  The downside to nuclear power plants is the possibility of radioactive leaks or a nuclear meltdown, in which could cause catastrophic damages to the environment, as in the case with the Chernobyl reactor facility in Russia.   Also, disposing of the radioactive waste is a major issue.

The last nuclear power plant to be built started construction in March of 1977 in the state of  Louisiana. The last plant to come online was in the state of Tennessee in 1996.  France derives over 75% of its electricity from nuclear and reports indicate that 70% of the population has a favorable opinion of nuclear energy.  The problem with going nuclear in the United States will be the NIMBY laws, an acronym for “not in my backyard.”    If the United States is going to replace oil in a big way, we should investigate nuclear energy very closely.

Below is a chart that shows the top uranium reserves in the world and the top uranium producing countries.

 

Top known uranium reserves per country

Top uranium producing countries 

Kazakhstan

Canada

Australia

Australia

South Africa

Nigeria

USA

Namibia

Canada

Russia

Brazil

 

Namibia

 

 

Wind, Solar and Hydroelectric
Currently renewable energies such as wind, solar and hydroelectric are under extensive research as alternatives to helping to reduce our dependencies on foreign oil.   In 2003, hydroelectric accounted for 7% of the total U.S. electrical production.  Renewable technologies can also help industries to achieve compliance with the Clean Air Act and other environmental regulations. Some renewables can be located in metropolitan areas where air pollution does not meet regulatory requirements. One of the main advantages that wind and solar energy have over coal, oil and natural gas is that they are constantly being replenished and will not run out in the foreseeable future. To date, wind and solar account for less than 1% of our country's electrical dependency, however, can be as high as 20% by the year 2030.
Hydrogen
Hydrogen can be produced from water through the process of electrolysis.  This method is not a very efficient on a large scale, but a great concept on a small scale for individuals to become energy independent. Using solar panels and/or wind generators to produce electricity to convert water to hydrogen is a perfect solution for innovators to create hydrogen for cars, trucks, and motor homes. 

Bulk hydrogen is best created by an extraction process from hydrocarbon fossil fuels.  Although this process is 80% efficient the down side is that it produces greenhouse gasses.  Many advances are being made in the area of hydrogen as a fuel source and should be given top consideration in the quest for energy independence. 

Paid for by the Mark Mulligan for Congress Committee